Effect of chop lenght of forage on voluntary intake and performance of lactating cows and dry ewes

  • D. H. D'ambrosio Becario de Conicet
  • M. G. Zappa Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • N. P. Stritzler Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal INTA EEA Anguil
  • A. Zuccari Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • L. Sollazo Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • G. D. Fernández Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • C. M. Ferri Becario de Conicet Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • S. Lardone Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal
  • J. H. Pagella Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía, Área de Producción Animal

Keywords:

chop length, maize, voluntary intake, lactating cows, dry ewes,

Abstract

The objectives of the present study were: 1) to measure the chop length produced by different forage harvesters on maize, and 2) to evaluate the effect of chopping on voluntary dry matter intake and performance. The experiment was carried out with lactating cows and dry ewes during 20 days, being the first 6 days for adaptation of the experimental animals to the dieto The whole plant of maize CV. colorado La Holandesa was used as animal feed, cut by four different ways, the four treatments: 1) PE: cutting of the whole plant by sickle; 2) PS: cutting and chopping by a hammermill machine; 3) PO: cutting and chopping by a hammermill, transporter and fan, and 4) PF: cutting and chopping by a two ways mili with knives. The feed was offered ad libitum to 16 Holstein- Freisian lactating cows and to 16 dry, non-pregnant Corriedale ewes into two experiment within a randomized blocks design each. The three chopping machines produced particles of different chop length: PS: tassel: 91.3 mm ± 7.63; leaf: 100.3 mm ± 10.47; stem: 114.8 mm ± 7.05; PO: tassel: 60.1 mm ± 9.86; leaf: 58.0 ± 4.74; stem: 90.8 ± 9.10; PF: tassel: 13.0 mm ± 1.21; leaf: 45.3 mm ± 3,62; stem: 23.8 mm ± 2.17. Within each plant part, all comparisons among chop length produced by the three machines were highly significant (P<0.01). The voluntary intake of the lactating cows was not different between treatments (P> 0.05). The lowest value was obtained in PS (80.3 g/kg LWO.75) and the highest in PF (91,2 g) (PE: 88.1 g; PO: 85.2 g). The voluntary intake of ewes was significantly lower in PE (21.6 g/kg LWO.75) than in PS (36.2 g) and in PO (36.0 g). AII other comparisons between treatments were not significant (P>0.05). The particle size did not significantly affect mil k production of the lactating cows (PE: 13.02 liters/cow.day; PS: 10.24 liters; PO: 10.24 liters; PF: 11.78 liters) and liweweight loss of ewes (PE: 217 g/day; PS: 51 g/day; PO: 35 g/day; PF: 133 g/day). The results show that, under these experimental conditions, chop length of forage does not affect voluntary intake and performance of lactating cows or dry ewes; the voluntary intake of maize by the dry ewes, however, was very low, especially when the whole plant was offered as feed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDERSON, R.(1982): Effect of stage of maturity and chop length on the chemical composition and utilization of formic acid-treated ryegrass and formic acid silage bv sheep. Grass.For.Sci. 37: 139-143.

BAXTER, H.D.; OWEN, J.R. y WALDO, D.R. (1966): Effect of laceration of chopped forage on preservation and feeding of alfalfa-orchard grass silage. J. Dairy Sci. 49: 1441-1445.

CASTLE, M.E.; RETTER, W.C. y WATSON, J.M. (19791: Silage and milk production: comparisons between grass silage of three different chop lengths. Grass For. Sci. 34: 293-301.

DESWYSEN, A.; VANBELLE, M. y FOCANT, M. (19781: The effect of silage chop length on the voluntary intake añd rumination behavior of sheep. J.Br. Grassld. Soc. 33: 107-115.

DULPHY, J.P. y DEMAROUILLY, C. (19731: Influence de la machine de récolte et de la finesse de hachage sur la valeur alimentaire des ensilages. Ann.Zootech. 22: 199-217.

DULPHY, J.P. y MICHALET, B. (19751: Influence comparée de la machine de récolte sur les quantités d'ensilage ingérées par les génisses et les moutons. Ann. Zootech. 24: 757-763.

DULPHY, J.P.; BECHET, G. y THOMSON, e. (19751: Influence de la structure physique et de la qualité de conservation des ensilages de graminées sur leur ingestibilité. Ann.Zootech. 24: 81-94.

DULPHY, J.P.; DEMAROUILLY, C. y REMOND, B. (19891: Quantités d'herbe ingérées par les vaches laitiáres, les génisses et les moutons: effet de quelques facteurs de variation et comparaison entre ces types d'animaux. Ann.Zootech. 38: 107-119.

FOX, D.G. (1986): Predicting dry matter intake of beef cattle. Proc.1986 Cornell Nutr. Conf. p. 117-124.

GORDON, F.J. (1982): The.effects of degree of chopping grass for silage an method of concentrate allocation on the performance of dairy cows. Grass For. Sci. 37: 59-65.

MARCHI, A. y GIRAUDO, C.G. (19731: Eragrostis curvula (Schrad), Nees, cv. Tanganyka: Efecto de la henificaci6n y picado sobre la digestibilidad y consumo. Rev. lnv. Agrop., Serie 1, 10: 133-141.

MONTGOMERY, M.J. y BAUMGARDT, B.R. (1965): Regulation of food intake in ruminants. 2.Rations varying in energy concentration and physical formo J.Dairy Sci. 48: 1623-1629.

MURDOCH, J.C. (1965): The effect of length of silage on its voluntary intake by cattle. J. Br. Grassland. Soc. 20: 54-58.

NORGAARD, P. (1987): The influence of level of feeding and physical form of the feed on the reticulo-rumen fermentation in dairy cows fed 12 times daily. Acta Agric.Scand. 37: 353-365.

POPPI, O.P.; NORTON, B.W.; MINSON, D.J. y HENDERICKSEN, R.E. (19801:The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. J. agric. Sci.(Camb.1 94: 275-280.

PRESTON, T.R. Y LENG, R.A. (19871: Matching ruminant production systems with available resources in the tropics and subtropics. Penambul Books, Armidale, Australia. 245 pp.

RAMALHO RIBEIRO, J.M.C. (1989): In vivo methods of measuring the feed value of straws. Intake measurent. In: Evaluation of straws in ruminants feeding (Chenost,.M. Y Reiniger, P. eds.I., Elsevier Applied Science, Londres,-1nglaterra, p. 22-35.

REES, M.SC. y L1TTLE, D.A. (1980): Differences between sheep and cattle in digestibility, voluntary intake and retention time in the rumen of three tropical grasses. J. agric. Sci.(Camb.1 94: 483-485.

SCHNEIDER, B.H. Y FLATT, W.P. (1975): The evaluation of feeds through digestibility experiments. The Univ. Georgia Press, Athens, U.S.A., 423.pp.

SOKAL, R.R. y ROHLF, F.J. (1979): Biometría: Principios y métodos estadísticos en la investigación biológica. Blume ed., Madrid, España, 537 pp.

THOMAS, P.C.; KELLY, N.C. y WAIT, M.K. (1976): The effect of physical form of a silage on its voluntary consumption and digestibility by sheep. J.Br.Grassld.Soc. 31: 19-22.

TILLEY, J.M.A. y,ERRY, R.A. (1963): A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J.Br.Grassld.S(l;:. 1B: 104-111.

VAN SOEST, P.J. (1982): Nutritional Ecology of the ruminant. O & B Books Inc., Corvallls, U.S.A., 373 pp.

WILKINS, R.J. (1988): The preservation of forages. In: Feed Science (Orskov, E.R. ed.l, World Animal SI nce, B4, Elsevier Science Publisher B" Amsterdam, Holanda, p.231-255.

Published

2020-06-09

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos y Técnicos