Variability of stem canker lenght caused by two Phomopsis helianthi isolates in sunflower hybrids

  • Martín Verschoor Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
  • Fernando Castano Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
  • Ariel Ridao Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias
  • Tomás Salaberry Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias

Keywords:

Diaporthe helianthi, Helianthus annuus, Assisted infection, Resistance, Selec

Abstract

Phomopsis helianthi is a fungus causing stem canker in sunflower plants. This disease occurs occasionally in Argentina, but the increase of sustainable agriculture practices might stimulate crop infection through plant debris left on the soil surface which becomes a niche for fungus propagules. Therefore, it is important to study the behaviour of sunflower hybrids exposed to attacks by this fungus. As the objective for the present work, sunflower hybrids were evaluated in terms of their response to inoculation with P. helianthi isolates from two different sites of Argentina: Pergamino (PERG) and Paraná (PAR). Stem canker length and proportion of broken stems were the investigated response variables. Differences in stem canker length were detected among hybrids. Fungus isolate from PERG produced longer stem cankers and higher number of broken stems than the one from PAR. From all the hybrids tested, Dekasol 3881 was the one with the lowest harm effects when exposed to the most pathogenic fungus isolate. Considering its low stem breaking effect, the isolate from Paraná would be more appropriate for breeding programmes, allowing plants selected for short canker length to remain standing for their use in the improvement of sunflower populations by crossing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAPRESID. 2012. Evolución de la superficie en siembra directa en Argentina. Campañas 1977/78 a 2010/11. http://www.aapresid. org.ar/wpcontent/uploads/2013/02/aapresid.evolucion_superficie_sd_argentina.1977_a_2011.pdf.

Agüero E. 2000. Etiología de manchas y cancros del nudo en tallos de girasol. En: Tesis M. Sc. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNMdP, Balcarce. 129 p.

ASAGIR. 2010. El girasol gana rentabilidad esta campaña. http://www.asagir.org.ar/asagir2008/news_detail.asp?id=177

Bertrand F. & D. Tourvieille. 1987. Phomopsis dutournesol: test de sélection. Inf.Tech.Cetiom 98: 12-18.

Bolsa de Cereales. 2012. Girasol: Panorama Agrícola Semanal. http://www.bolcereales.com.ar/descargardocumento10/pass

Cáceres C., F. Castaño, R. Rodriguez, A. Ridao, T. Salaberry, M. Echeverria & M. Colabelli. 2007. Phomopsis resistance on leaves and stems of Helianthus petiolaris. Helia 47: 213-218.

Catalano V., D. Rekab, G. Firrao, G. Vannacci & M. Vergara. 2012. An endopolygalacturonase gene of Diaporthe helianthi. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 51: 23−36.

CETIOM. 1992. Les stades repérés du tournesol (Cetiom ed.). Paris, Francia. 30 p.

Domínguez Brando J. & A. Sarquis. 2012. Challenges for the sunflower oil market for 2020. En: Actas de la 18ª Conferencia Internacional de Girasol (ASAGIR eds). Mar del Plata Balcarce, Argentina. pp 28-32.

Febina M., K. Alananbeh, N. Balbyshv, E. Heitkamp, L. Castlebury, T. Gulya & S. Markell. 2012. Reevaluation of Phomopsis species affecting sunflowers in the United States. En: Actas de la 18ª Conferencia Internacional de Girasol (ASAGIR eds). Mar del PlataBalcarce, Argentina. pp 211-214.

Finlay K. & G. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust.J.Agric.Res. 14: 742-754.

García C., K. Mulero, E. Agüero, F. Castaño, A. Ridao & R. Rodríguez. 2000. Sunflower performance after Phomopsis helianti inoculation in the petiole. Test of Agrochem and Cv. 21: 17-18.

Jocić S., N. Lačok, V. Miklić, D. Škorić & Y. Griveau. 2004. Testing two isolates of Diaporthe/Phomopsis helianthi in a population of sunflower recombinant inbred lines. Helia 27: 129-136.

Kong G. 2009. Diagnostic methods for Phomopsis stem canker-Phomopsis helianthi. http://old.padil.gov.au/pbt/index.php?q=node/70&pbtID=176

Leonard K. & R. Moll. 1981. Durability of general resistance. Evaluation of cultivar x isolate interactions. En: Proceedings of Symposia: IX International Congress of Plant Protection (T. Kommedahl ed). Washington DC. pp. 190-193.

Manzur M., A. Hall & C. Chimenti. 2008. Susceptibilidad al quebrado en el cultivo de girasol: variabilidad intraespecífica y efectos de la densidad poblacional sobre los tejidos presentes en el tallo. En: Actas de la 13ª Reunión Latinoamericana y 27ª Reunión Argentina de Fisiología Vegetal. Rosario, Argentina. p 80.

Mihaljcevic M. & J. Vukojevic. 1994. Diaporthe (Phomopsis) spp. on weeds possible causative agents of sunflower stem canker in Vojvodina province. Helia 17: 39-48.

Miller J. 1987. Sunflower. En: Principles of Cultivar Development (W.Fehr ed.). MacMillan Pub. Co., NY. pp. 626-668.

Marín-Moreno C., 2013. La soja, nuevamente el cultivo favorito de los agricultores argentinos. En: La Nación Campo. http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1613155-la-soja-nuevamente-el -cultivo-favorito-de-los-agricultoresargentinos.

Ostle B. 1968. Estadística aplicada. Técnicas de estadística moderna, cuando y donde aplicarlas. 1ª reimpresión. Limusa-Wiley SA., Mexico DF.

Pereyra S., A. Fassio, S. Stewart, M. Rodriguez & D. Vilaró. 2008. Estrategias para el manejo de Phomopsis en girasol. En: Jornada de Cultivos de Verano 2008. INIA, Uruguay. Serie Actividades de Difusión Nº 550. pp .4-9.

Reimonte G. & F. Castaño. 2008. Susceptibilidad de híbridos de girasol (Helianthus annuus) a la podredumbre media del tallo y quebrado caulinar producido por Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Cien. Inv. Agr. 35: 27-35.

Ridao A. 1994. Quebrado de tallo y otras afecciones provocadas por Diaporthe helianthi (Phomopsis helianthi Munt.). En: Enfermedades del girasol en la Argentina, Manual de reconocimiento. (V. Pereyra & A. Escande eds). Unidad Integrada Balcarce. Balcarce. pp. 61-66.

Schneiter A. & J. Miller. 1981. Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Sci. 21: 901-903.

Seiler G. 1997. Anatomy and morphology of sunflower. En: Sunflower Technology and Production (A. Schneiter ed.). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Wisconsin. pp. 67-111.

Tourvieille D., F. Vear & C. Pelletier. 1988. Use of two mycelium tests in breeding sunflower resistant to Phomopsis. En: Proceedings of the 12th International Sunflower Conference(ISA ed). Novi Sad, II: 110-114.

USDA2011.Agricultural statistics 2011. Sunflower: Area and production in specified countries. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgStatistics/2011/Chapter03.pdf

Verschoor M., F. Castaño, A. Ridao & R. Rodríguez. 1998. Phomopsis helianthi resistance in sunflowers after midstem inoculation. Ann. Appl. Biol. 132(Sup.): 48-49.

Viguié A., D. Tourvieille & F. Vear. 2000. Inheritance of several sources of resistance to Phomopsis stem canker (Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvet.) in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 116: 167-179.

Viguié A., F. Vear & D. Tourvieille. 1999. Interactions between French isolates of Phomopsis /Diaporthe helianthi Munt.-Cvet. et al. and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genotypes. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 105: 693-702

Published

2018-08-13

How to Cite

Verschoor, M., Castano, F., Ridao, A., & Salaberry, T. (2018). Variability of stem canker lenght caused by two Phomopsis helianthi isolates in sunflower hybrids. Semiárida, 24(1). Retrieved from https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/index.php/semiarida/article/view/3185

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos y Técnicos