Global Infrastructures and Methodological Literacy in the Digital Humanities. The Case of The Programming Historian in Spanish
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/qs.v30i2.9731Keywords:
infrastructure, knowledge, networksAbstract
The development of Digital Humanities in Latin America has been hampered by deficiencies in infrastructure and digital literacy in the region, exacerbated by the lack of multidisciplinary approaches in universities and institutions. The Programming Historian is a project that originated in Canada in 2007 and has become a global infrastructure for the creation, research, and dissemination of content related to the autonomous development of computational skills by and for humanists. This article explores the challenges and strategies that enabled the construction of a global network of historians and humanists around a publication of methodological flows that address data-driven research. The Programming Historian not only contains tutorials but has also created a network of practice spanning multiple countries. It is argued that it has constituted a model of infrastructure, methodological literacy, and collaboration for leveraging common resources to create humanistic knowledge. Furthermore, it is noted that its model can be replicated in Latin America and other regions of the Global South to address the difficulties in building high-level infrastructure for the humanities.
Downloads
References
Afanador-Llach, M. J. y Lombana, A. (2018, 21 de junio). Archivos digitales, cultura participativa y nuevos alfabetismos: La catalogación colaborativa del Archivo Histórico Regional de Boyacá (Colombia). Conferencia de Humanidades Digitales, Ciudad de México. https://dh2018.adho.org/en/archivos-digitales-cultura-participativa-y-nuevos-alfabetismos-la-catalogacion-colaborativa-del-archivo-historico-regional-de-boyaca-colombia/
Afanador-Llach, M. J. y Lombana, A. (2022). Developing new literacy skills and digital scholarship infrastructures in the Global South. En D. Fiormonte, S. Chaudhuri y P. Ricaurte (Eds.), Global debates in the digital humanities (pp. 225-238). University of Minnesota Press.
Benardou, A., Champion, E., Dallas, C. y Hughes, L. M. (Eds.). (2018). Cultural heritage infrastructures in digital humanities. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Blaney, J., Winters, J., Milligan, S. y Steer, M. (2021). Doing digital history: A beginner’s guide to working with text as data. Manchester University Press.
Brügger, N. (2018). The archived web: Doing history in the digital age. The MIT Press.
Burnard, L. (2019). How modeling standards evolve. The case of TEI. En J. Flanders y F. Jannidis (Eds.), The shape of data in the digital humanities: Modeling texts and text-based resources (pp. 99-116). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Clement, T. E. (2013). Text Analysis, Data Mining, and Visualizations in Literary Scholarship. Literary Studies in the Digital Age. https://dlsanthology.mla.hcommons.org/text-analysis-data-mining-and-visualizations-in-literary-scholarship/
Cohen, D. J. y Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Digital history: A guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the Web. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Cohen, D. J. y Scheinfeldt, T. (Eds.). (2013). Hacking the Academy: New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65swj3
Crymble, A. e Im, C. M. H. (2023). Measuring digital humanities learning requirements in Spanish & English-speaking practitioner communities’. International Journal of Digital Humanities, 5, 253-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-023-00066-x
Crymble, A. (2021). Technology and the historian: Transformations in the digital age. University of Illinois Press.
del Rio Riande, G. (2022). Digital Humanities and Visible and Invisible Infrastructures. En D. Fiormonte, S. Chaudhuri y P. Ricaurte (Eds.), Global debates in the digital humanities (pp. 247-258). University of Minnesota Press.
Dombrowski, Q. (2022). Minimizing Computing Maximizes Labor. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 16(2). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/16/2/000594/000594.html
Earhart, A. E. (2015). The Digital Humanities as a Laboratory. En P. Svensson y D. T. Goldberg (Eds.), Between humanities and the digital (pp. 391-400). The MIT Press.
Endres, B. (2017). A literacy of building: making in the digital humanities. En J. Sayers (Ed.), Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452963778
Fiormonte, D. (2012). Towards a Cultural Critique of Digital Humanities. Historical Social Research, 37(3), 59-76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41636597
Galina Russell, I. (2014). Geographical and linguistic diversity in the Digital Humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu005
Gibbs, F. (2015). Editorial Sustainability and Open Peer Review at Programming Historian. DH Commons, (1). https://web.archive.org/web/20180713014622/http://dhcommons.org/journal/issue-1/editorial-sustainability-and-open-peer-review-programming-historian
Gibbs, F. y Owens, T. (2013). The Hermeneutics of Data and Historical Writing. In J. Dougherty y K. Nawrotzki (Eds.), Writing History in the Digital Age (pp. 159-170). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sx57.18
Guiliano, J. (2022). A primer for teaching digital history: Ten design principles. Duke University Press.
Hirsch, B. D. (Ed.). (2012). Digital humanities pedagogy: Practices, principles and politics. Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0024
Lincoln, M., Isasi, J., Melton, S. y Laramée, F. D. (2022). Relocating Complexity: The Programming Historian and Multilingual Static Site Generation. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 16(2).
Liu, A. (2 de mayo de 2016). Drafts for Against the Cultural Singularity (book in progress). Alan Liu. http://doi.org/10.21972/G2B663
Liu, A. (2018a). Friending the past: The sense of history in the digital age. The University of Chicago Press.
Liu, A. (2018b). Toward Critical Infrastructure Studies. Critical Infrastructure Studies. http://cistudies.org/wp-content/uploads/Toward-Critical-Infrastructure-Studies.pdf
Malazita, J. (2021). Epistemic Infrastructure, the Instrumental Turn, and the Digital Humanities. En A. D. Nieves, A. B. McGrail y S. Senier (Eds.), People, practice, power: Digital humanities outside the center (pp. 3-23). University of Minnesota Press.
Milligan, I. (2022). The transformation of historical research in the digital age. Cambridge University Press.
Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2021). Laboratory. A New Space in Digital Humanities. En A. D. Nieves, A. B. McGrail y S. Senier (Eds.), People, practice, power: Digital humanities outside the center (pp. 58-69). University of Minnesota Press.
Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2022). Infrastructuring digital humanities: On relational infrastructure and global reconfiguration of the field. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 37(2), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab086
Priani, E. (10 de marzo de 2012). ¿Infraestructura de cómputo para las humanidades? Red de Humanidades Digitales. http://humanidadesdigitales.net/infraestructura-de-computo-para-las-humanidades/
Robertson, S. (2016). The Differences between Digital Humanities and Digital History. En M. K. Gold y L. F. Klein (Eds.), Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016 (pp. 289-307). University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1cn6thb.28
Rodríguez-Yunta, L. (2014). Ciberinfraestructura para las humanidades digitales: Una oportunidad de desarrollo tecnológico para la biblioteca académica. El profesional de la información, 23(5), 453-462. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2014.sep.01
Salmi, H. (2020). What is digital history? John Wiley & Sons.
Shep, S. J. (2015). Digital Materiality. En S. Schreibman, R. Siemens y J. Unsworth (Eds.), A New Companion to Digital Humanities (pp. 322-330). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch22
Steyn, J. y Goodrich, A. (2022). Site-Specific Cultural Infrastructure: Promoting access and conquering the digital divide. En D. Fiormonte, S. Chaudhuri y P. Ricaurte (Eds.), Global Debates in the Digital Humanities (pp. 259-270). University of Minnesota Press.
Svensson, P. (2015). The Humanitoscope-Exploring the situatedness of Humanities Infrastructure. En P. Svensson y D. T. Goldberg (Eds.), Between humanities and the digital (pp. 391-400). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9465.003.0030
Svensson, P. (2016). Big digital humanities: imagining a meeting place for the humanities and the digital. University of Michigan Press.
Unsworth, J. (1997, 14 de septiembre). Creating Digital Resources: The Work of Many Hands [ponencia]. Digital Resources for the Humanities, Oxford, Inglaterra. http://johnunsworth.name/drh97.html
van Lit, L. W. C. (2020). Among Digitized Manuscripts. Philology, Codicology, Paleography in a Digital World. BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400351
Vodă, A. I., Cautisanu, C., Grădinaru, C., Tănăsescu, C. y de Moraes, G. H. S. M. (2022). Exploring Digital Literacy Skills in Social Sciences and Humanities Students. Sustainability, 14(5), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052483
Wenger, E. (2001). Comunidades de práctica: Aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Ediciones Paidós.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Quinto Sol

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
When submitting their contributions, authors must declare that they have the permission of the file or repository where the documents that are attached to the work were obtained, whatever their format (unpublished manuscripts, images, audiovisual files, etc.). Such permission authorizes their publication and reproduction, releasing the journal and its editors from any liability or claim from third parties.
Likewise, authors must adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial CC BY-NC-SA", through which the author allows copying, reproducing, distributing, publicly communicating the work and generating derivative works, as long as the original author is properly quoted and acknowledged. It is not allowed, however, to use the work for commercial purposes. Authors may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in the journal (for example, placing it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), with the acknowledgment of having been published first in this journal.
The publication of content in this journal does not imply any royalty or charge for taxpayers.
Quinto Sol adheres to the DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
4.png)
2.png)












_(2).png)


1.jpg)



1.jpg)




