No conventional cereals, tricepiro (Triticum x Secale x Thrinopyrum) y triticale (Triticum x Secale) utilization in pigs feedeng. Two experiences.

  • R. Esteves Leyte Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía
  • R. O. Braun Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía
  • J. E. Cervellini Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía
  • S. Pattacini INTA EEA Anguil, La Pampa
  • G. Scoles INTA EEA Anguil, La Pampa

Keywords:

tricepiro, triticale, feeding diets, growing-finishing gilts,

Abstract

The objective of these experiments was to study the different cereal grains ("tricepiro and trilicale") as energy sourees in growing-finishing diets. The hybrid gilts (Yorl<shire x Landrace x Duroc Jersey) were fed sd-/lbltum during 56 days with: 16% C.P.; 3.300 Kcal DElkg, 1,30% Ca; 0,93% P and 0,82% of Iys (Dry weight). The first experiment was done wilh tricepiro "Don René" (T1), triticale "Tehuelche" (T2) and the mixture of both triticale (50-50) "Don Erman and Don Frank" (T3), being compare with Com (T0)as a control in hybrid gilts between 57 - 100 kg Iiveweight, confined in individual boxes. In a second trial triticale "Yagén" (T4) and triticale "Don Santiago" (T5) were evaluated versus Corn (T0). AII other experimental conditions being the same as for trial one. The results of the first trial were: Oally welght galn (p<0,025): T2= 868,62 9 a; T3= 840,35 sb; T0=753,50 bc and T1= 729,25 c. Feed Intake In sil the period (p<0,01):T0= 181,95 kg  a; T3= 167,85 b, T2= 164,90 be and T1= 155 c. Conversion efflciency (p<0,01): T0=4,31:1 8; T1= 3,83:1 b; T3= 3,59:1 bc and T2= 3,40:1 c. Backfat thlckness (p<0,01):T0- 26,12 mm a; T3= 23,19 b; T1= 20,82 C and T2= 19,91 c. Fatty acid ratio: T2= 1,17% of oleic acid, T3= 1,59; T0=3,65 and T1= 3,67. Second trial results were: Oally welght gain (p<00,01):T0= 948 9 a; T5= 942 a; and T4= 883 b. Feed Intake In all th8 period (p<0,01): T4= 159,55 kg a; T5= 173,34 b, and T0= 169,51 b, but not found statistical difference In conversion efflciency and backfat thickness. Fatty acid ratio: T2= 1,17% of oleic acid, T3= 1,59; T0=3,65 and T1= 3,67. We conclude that trilicale Tehuelche, the mixture of Don Erman and Don Frank, and Don Santiago can be included in growing-finishing diets for hybrid gilts on account of the daily weight gain and faed conversion results obtained. tricepiro Don René showed the best result for backfat thickness and feed intake. indeed, Triticales tried in these diets produced carcasses with excellent values of backfat thickness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burgstaller, G.; M. Bohm and G. Propsmeir. 1991. Experiments ondigestibility and feeding value of

triticale in pigs and rumiants. Pigs News and Informatíon, vol. 12 ~ 3.

Covas, G. 1976. Tricepiro: un nuevo verdeo que involucra al trigo, centeno y agropiro. Informativo EERA Anguil 82: 2-3.

Covas G. y M. Frecentese 1982. Dos nuevos cultivares de triticale forrajero para la Región SemiáridaPampeana. Informativo EERA Anguil 68: 1.

Covas G. y D. Montalvo 1978. Trlgopiro: un cereal sintético de cualidades interesantes. Informativo EERA Anguil 72:2.

Dexter, J. E. and B.L. Dronzek, 1975. Note on the amino acid composltion of protein fractions from a developing

triticale and its rye and durum wheat parents. Department of Plant Science, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Cánada. Cereal Chemists: 62.

Esteves Leyte, R; RO. Braun y J.E. Cervellini. 1985. Empleo del triticale en la alimentación de cerdos en engorde. Rev. Fac. de Agronomía UNLPam, vol. 1 N° 1-2: 7-15. Argentina.

Dreussi, W.L. 1998. Características de algunos cultivares obtenidos en la Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil. Boletín de Divulgación Técnica N°54 EERA Anguil (actualización): 18-21.

Esteves Leyte, R, M. Ginglns y J.E. Cervellini. 1983. Empleo del triticale en la alimentación de los cerdos en engorde. Rev. Argentina de Producción Animal, vol 10: 207-212.

Frecentese, M. Y G. Covas 1984. Comportamiento de nuevos verdeos en la Región Pampeana Semiárida. Informativo EERA Anguil 82: 3-4.

Lorenz, K.J and K. Kulp. 1991. Handbokk of Cereal Science and TElchnology.Trlticale: Production and Utllization.

Myer, RO., RO. Bamett and G.E. Combs. 1990. Evaluation of three cultivars as potential feed gains for swine.Anual Swine Field Day, 35: 66-74. Florida, U.S.A. Official Methods of Analysis. 1992. Ed. AOAC.

Pearson, D. 1993. Técnicas de laboratorio para análisis de alimentos. Ed. Zaragoza. España. 203 p.

Primo Yúfsra, E. 1979. aulmica Agrícola 111.Alimentos. Alhambra. Madrid. Espalla. 683 p.

Poznanski, W., A. Komiewicz; S. Jasek and B. Fuchs. 1993. The use of feed mixtures contalnlng triticale in feeding gifts, pregnant and lactating sows. Pig News and Information, vol. 14 N° 1.

Royo, C. 1992. El Triticale: Bases para el cultivo y aprovechamiento. Ed. Mundi-Prensa. Madrid.

Vohra, P, S.,Bersch, C. aualset., Becker, R 1991. Trltlcale: an altemative cereal grain in broiler start diets. California Agriculture, vol. 45 N°5: 34-36.

Whittemore, C. 1993. Ciencia y Práctica de la Producción Porcina. Ed. Acribia, S.A.. Zaragoza. España. 647 p

Published

2020-04-23

How to Cite

Esteves Leyte, R., Braun, R. O., Cervellini, J. E., Pattacini, S., & Scoles, G. (2020). No conventional cereals, tricepiro (Triticum x Secale x Thrinopyrum) y triticale (Triticum x Secale) utilization in pigs feedeng. Two experiences. Semiárida, 10(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/semiarida/article/view/4727

Issue

Section

Artículos Científicos y Técnicos