Answering or understanding in exam situations. Some contributions from the concept of strategy of thinking
Keywords:
strategy of thinking, psychic singularity, examinationAbstract
This article presents the results of part of a research project that examined the degree of articulation between students thinking strategies and teachers examination proposals in the classroom, which was carried out during the period 2001-2003 at Universidad Nacional del Comahue. The theoretical framework includes psychoanalysis and genetic psychology, since both trends allow for the study of the psychic singularity in its double dimension: cognitive and symbolic. The concept of strategy of thinking applied in order to carry out the research is the one developed by Narciso Benbenaste (1995). The qualitative methodology used included observations of the group-class and clinical interviews to the sample students following a clinico-critical approach. Students from a state school in Viedma, Río Negro, were selected for the empirical part of the research. The aim of this work was to identify the operative and symbolic mechanisms used by students of 3rd year EGB (primary school) to solve the situations presented in tests, especially in the areas of Language and Maths. Problem solving strategies have been identified, and it has been proved that students can solve a situation easily, in most cases with a low anxiety level, if it is not very different from the ones done previously in class. In several tests, students production answered what was asked by the teacher, in others they could establish more relations than those expressed in writing, such relations resulted from background knowledge or subjective appreciation. Exam situations are mainly regarded as stressful, very often determining students strategies to solve problems.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Editorial Committee Educational Praxis Magazine:
I hereby declare that I am the author of the article titled (article name), that it is original and my own and that it was not previously published in any other format or medium. I declare to know that the magazine will not charge me any type of fee under any circumstances, nor will I receive any type of monetary compensation If it were accepted for publication in Educational Praxis, I authorize the aforementioned magazine to publish it digitally and to advertise it on its social networks.
If the work is published, I adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA", through which it is allowed to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work and generate derivative works, as long as when the original author is cited and acknowledged. This license has been used since September 2018. In 2016 CC BY NC ND 4.0 was adhered to; and in the years 2017 and 2018 (January-August) CC BY NC 4.0.
This CC BY-NC-SA Share Alike license does not, however, permit commercial use of the work. As an author, the journal may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, it allows me to self-archive the published articles, in their post-print version, in institutional, thematic repositories, personal web pages or any other relevant use. with the recognition of having been first published in this journal.
Educational Praxis adheres to DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).