Didactic conceptions and use of ICT in the university education of degree. Multi-case study and TPACK analysis framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2018-220106Keywords:
ICT curriculum integration, experienced university professors, representations around ICTAbstract
We present partial results of the research “The construction of didactic knowledge of content in experienced and beginners teachers of the UNNE. Multi-case study”,whose objective is the understanding of the processes of construction of the professional knowledge of university teachers, specifically related to the didactic- echnological knowledge of the content (TPACK). We propose the analysis of eachers’ representations on the use of ICTs in teaching proposals and in student earning experiences, central aspects to locate the technological dimension in different levels of curricular integration in the aulic projects. We report 4 case studies consisting of arratives of experienced teachers of single-paradigmatic and multiparadigmatic disciplines of two Academic Units of the UNNE. Based on the analysis and interpretation of the different modes of integration of digital technologies, we note the emergence of indications that account for the complex relationships between didactic, technological and disciplinary knowledge.
Downloads
References
Angeli, C. y Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 54-168.
Arancibia, M., Soto, C. y Contreras, P. (2010). Concepciones del profesor sobre el uso educativo de las TIC asociadas a procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Estudios Pedagógicos, 36(1), 23-51.
Cabero Almenara, J. (2014). La formación del profesorado en TIC: Modelo TPACK. Recuperado de https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/266733957
Caicedo Tamayo, A. y Rojas Ospina, T. (2014). Creencias, conocimientos y usos de las TIC de los profesores universitarios. Educación y Educadores, 17 (3), 517-533.
Chan Núñez, M. (2016). La virtualización de la educación superior en América Latina: entre tendencias y paradigmas. Recuperado de http://www.um.es/ead/rred/48/chan.pdf
Coll, C. (2011). Aprender y enseñar con las TIC: expectativas, realidad y p otencialidades. En R. Carneiro; J. Toscano y T. Díaz (Coord.), Los desafíos de las TIC para el cambio educativo (pp.115-125). España: OEI y Fundación Santillana.
Corral, N. y Bar, A. (2012). Construcción de Racionalidades Disciplinares. Cinta de Moebio, (45), 215-234.
Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
Flores, F. y Ortiz, M. (2016). Concepciones didácticas en torno al conocimiento tecnológico en las aulas universitarias. Recuperado de: https://www.aacademica. org/000-044/404
Gewerc, A., Pernas, E., y Varela, J. (2013). Conocimiento tecnológico – didáctico del contenido en la enseñanza de ingeniería informática: un estudio de caso colaborativo con la perspectiva del docente y los investigadores. Docencia Universitaria REDU, 11, 349-374.
Graham, Ch. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57, 1953-1960.
Jorba, J. (2000). La comunicación y las habilidades cognitivo lingüísticas. En J. Jorba, I. Gómez y A. Prat (Eds.), Hablar y escribir para aprender. Uso de la lengua en situación de enseñanza-aprendizaje desde las áreas curriculares (pp. 29-49). Madrid: Síntesis.
Koehler, M., Mishra, P. y Cain, W. (2015). ¿Qué son los saberes tecnológicos y pedagógicos del contenido (TPACK)? Virtualidad, Educación y Ciencia, 10(6), 9 -23.
Koehler M. y Mishra, P. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In C. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 2214-2226). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of computing in education.
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A. y Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285-291.
Lueddeke, G. (2003). Professionalising Teaching Practice in Higher Education: a study of disciplinary variation and ‘teaching-scholarship’. Studies in Higher Education, 28 (2), 213-228.
Marcelo, C. y Vaillant, D. (2009). Desarrollo profesional docente: ¿Cómo se aprende a enseñar? Madrid: Narcea
Marcelo, C., Yot, C. y Mayor, C. (2015). Enseñar con tecnologías digitales en la Universidad. Comunicar, 23(45), 117-124.
Martínez Sánchez, A. (2000). El estudio de casos como estrategia didáctica para la formación de profesionales de la acción social. El estudio de casos: paraprofesionales de la acción social. Madrid: Narcea.
Mishra, P. y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Montes, J. y Ochoa, S. (2006). Apropiación de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación en cursos universitarios. Recuperado de http://www.redalyc. org/articulo.oa?id=79890209
Sánchez, J. (2003). Integración curricular de las TIC: conceptos e ideas. Enfoques Educacionales, 5(1), 51-65.
Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. y Shin, T. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. En Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4 -14.
Stake, R. (2007). Investigación con estudios de caso. Madrid: Morata.
Tarasow, F., Trech, M. y Swartzman, G. (2007). Gestión de TIC en instituciones educativas. Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales FLACSO: Bs. As.
Trigwell, K. (2002). Approaches to teaching design subjects: a quantitative analysis, design and communication. Estudies in Higher Education, 1, 69-80.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Editorial Committee Educational Praxis Magazine:
I hereby declare that I am the author of the article titled (article name), that it is original and my own and that it was not previously published in any other format or medium. I declare to know that the magazine will not charge me any type of fee under any circumstances, nor will I receive any type of monetary compensation If it were accepted for publication in Educational Praxis, I authorize the aforementioned magazine to publish it digitally and to advertise it on its social networks.
If the work is published, I adhere to the Creative Commons license called "Attribution - Non-Commercial Share Alike CC BY-NC-SA", through which it is allowed to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work and generate derivative works, as long as when the original author is cited and acknowledged. This license has been used since September 2018. In 2016 CC BY NC ND 4.0 was adhered to; and in the years 2017 and 2018 (January-August) CC BY NC 4.0.
This CC BY-NC-SA Share Alike license does not, however, permit commercial use of the work. As an author, the journal may establish additional agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal, it allows me to self-archive the published articles, in their post-print version, in institutional, thematic repositories, personal web pages or any other relevant use. with the recognition of having been first published in this journal.
Educational Praxis adheres to DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment) signed in San Francisco, California, on December 16, 2012, and to the Declaration of Mexico (Joint Declaration LATINDEX - REDALYC - CLACSO - IBICT).
3.png)
_(2).png)
2.jpg)
