LA NOCIÓN DE INTERSECCIONALIDAD: DESDE LA TEORÍA A LA LEY Y LA PRÁCTICA EN EL ÁMBITO DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS

Cecilia Gebruers

Cecilia Gebruers Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School, Nueva York, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2149-9088

Palavras-chave:

Teoría Jurídica, Derechos Humanos, Estudios de Género, Feminismo, Interseccionalidad

Resumo

El concepto de interseccionalidad ha sido proclamado como la contribución teórica más importante que han hecho los estudios de género hasta el momento (McCall, 2005, p. 1771), quizás por su ambiciosa promesa de proveer formas más efectivas de abordar las diversas y complejas formas de desigualdad que viven las mujeres (Conaghan, 2009, p. 21) A su vez, se caracteriza por los calurosos debates que genera en torno a sus orígenes, metodologías, su relación con las políticas identitarias y tendencias jurídicas, entre otros temas que se encuentran en una disputa constante. (Nash, 2017, p. 118) Sin embargo, el presente trabajo tiene el objetivo de brindar una aproximación al concepto de interseccionalidad desde tres dimensiones, la teoría, la ley y la práctica. En primer lugar, se desarrollarán brevemente aspectos teóricos de la interseccionalidad que, sin buscar ser exhaustiva, brinda nociones básicas para presentar algunos desafíos teóricos. En segundo lugar, se abordará la recepción del concepto de interseccionalidad —por contraposición al abordaje desde el principio de no discriminación— en la letra de la ley, específicamente en el ámbito de los derechos humanos. En tercer lugar, se analizará la traducción de nociones teóricas y normativas en la aplicación efectiva, a partir de recientes sentencias de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Cecilia Gebruers, Benjamin N. Cardozo Law School, Nueva York, USA

Abogada (Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Buenos Aires), Máster en Derecho en Pensamiento Jurídico Comparado (LL.M) y Candidata a Doctora en Derecho (J.S.D.) (Facultad de Derecho Benjamin N. Cardozo).

Referências

Bond, J. (2003). International Intersectionality: A Theretical and Pragmatic Exploration of Women's International Human Rights Violations . Emory Law Journal , 71-186.

Brown, W. (1995). States of Injury. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Brown, W. (2005). Edgework. Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Carastathis, A. (2016). Intersectionality: origins, Contestations, Horizons. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Charlesworth, H. (1994). What are "Women's International Human Rights"? In R. Cook, Human Rights of Women: National and International perspectives (pp. 58-84). Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Chow, P. Y. (2016). has Intersectionality Reached its Limits? Intersectionality in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies Practice and the Issue of Ambivalence . Human Rights Law Review, 16(3), 453-481.

Collins, P. H. (1993). Toward a New Vision: Race, Class and Gender as Categoris of Analysis and Connection. Race, Sex and Class, 25-45.

Conaghan, J. (2009). Intersectionality and the Feminist Project in Law. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman, Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location (pp. 21-48). New York: Routledge.

Cooper, D. (2008). Intersectional Travel Through Evryday Utopias. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman, Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location (pp. 299-325). New York: Routledge.

Cornell, D. (1991, May). Review: Sexual difference, the Feminine, and Equivalency: A Critique of Mackinnon’s Toward a feminist theory of the state. Vol. 100(7), 2247-2275.

Cornell, D. (2011). Revisiting Beyond Accommodation after Twenty Years. feminists@law, 1(1).

Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139, 138-167.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 1241-1299.

Crenshaw, K., & Schulz, P. (2016, Abril 2016). Interview with Kimberlé Crenshaw and Patricia Schulz. (E. R. Trust, Interviewer)

Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 230-243.

Dhamoon, R. K. (2011). Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 230-243.

Frug, M. J. (1992). A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (An Unfinished Draft) . Harvard Law Review, 105, 1045-1075.

Grabham, E. (2008). Intersectionality: Traumatic Impressions. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman, Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location (pp. 183-200). New York: Routledge.

Grillo, T. (2013). Anti-Essentialism and Intersectionality: Tools to Dismantle the Master's House. Berkley Journal of Gender, Law and Justice, 16, 16-30.

Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Holder, C. L., & Corntassel, J. J. (2002). Indigenous Peoples and Multicultural Citizenship: Bridging Collective and Individual RIghts . Human Rights Quarterly, 24, 126-139.

Hunter, R., & De Simone, T. (2008). Identifying disadvantage. Beyond Intersectionality. In E. Grabham, D. Cooper, J. Krishnadas, & D. Herman, Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location (pp. 159-182). New York: Routledge.

Kennedy, D. (2018). On Intersectionality. En prensa.

Koukkanen, R. (2012). Self-Determination and Indigenous Women's Rights at the Intersection of International Human RIghts. Human Rigths Quarterly, 225-250.

Lugones, M. (2008). Colonialidad y Género. Tabula Raza, 73-101.

MacKinnon, C. A. (2013). Intersectionality as Method: A Note. Signs, 38(4), 1019-1030.

May, V. M. (2015). Pursuing Intersectionality, Unsettling Dominant Imaginaries. New York: Routledge.

McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771-1800.

Nash, J. (2008). re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 1-15.

Nash, J. C. (2017). Intersectionality and Its Discontents. American Quarterly, 69, 117-129.

Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review, 91(5), 1053-1075.

Scott, J. (2010). Gender: Still a Useful Category of Analysis? . Diogenes, 57(1), 7-14.

Shelton, D. (2009). Prohibited Discrimination in International Law. In A. Constantinides, & N. Zaikos, The Diversity of International Law. Essays in Honour of Professor Kalliopi K. Koufa (pp. 261-292). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

Smart, C. (1989). Feminism and the Power of Law. New York: Routledge.

Sumi Cho, K. W. (2013, Summer). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Signs, 38 (4).

Wiessner, S. (2012). Indigenous Self-Determination, Culture and Land: A Reassessment in Light of the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. In E. Pulitano, Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. 2012: Cambridge University Press.

Young, I. M., & Allen, D. S. (2011). Justice and the Politics of Difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women's Studies, 193-209.