Kinematic aspects of the criollo argentino horse at trot

  • Edgardo Verna Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias ( fallecido)
  • Santiago Andres Audisio National University of La Pampa. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences
  • Pablo Guillermo Vaquero Fa
  • Liliana Rossetto National University of La Pampa. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences
  • Valeria Arriagada National University of La Pampa. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences
  • Gisela Milanta National University of La Pampa. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19137//cienvet202224105

Keywords:

Criollo Argentino horse, joint, angle, kinematic

Abstract

Biokinematic variables of the locomotion of the Criollo Argentino breed of horses, of which there is no specific information. These variables may be used with clinical and physiotherapeutic objectives and in reproduction programmes. 8 Criollo Argentino mares were used in the study. Refractive markers were placed in anatomical sites previously determined. They were made to trot covering a distance of 15 meters on grass guided by hand. Each individual repeated the activity three times, which were recorded on video. The photograms were introduced in the software ImageJ to measure the joint angles of scapular and pelvic inclination, protraction, retraction, extension, flexion and angular amplitude of each joint in the limbs. Simultaneously, the length and number of strides for all limbs and the speed at which they covered 15 meters. The statistical description of variables was carried out. The horses covered the distance in 22.99 sec. at 4.08 m/sec. doing 5.69 strides of a length of 2.66 m. per 0.65 sec.. The protraction and retraction angles were 22.63º and 6.8º; 9.06º and 22.03º for the thoracic
and pelvic limbs. The scapular and pelvic inclination angles were 73.19º-60.79º (12.4º); and 33.11º-26.52º (6,58º). The extension and flexion angles and angular amplitude were: shoulder 12807º-116.93º, 11.13º, elbow 159.85º-144.60º, 15.52º; carpus 175.85º-172.18º, 3.66º, hip 103.38º–86.19º, 17.18º; patella 138.57º-118.56º, 20.01º; tarsus 153.79º–142.85º, 10.94º and thoracic limb fetlock 159.68º-126.89º, 32.79º and pelvic limb fetlock 161.09º-129.68º, 31.41º. The range of retraction-protraction of the limbs contributes to the knowledge of synchronicity of the ipsilateral retraction of the forelimb and the protraction of the hindlimb during trotting. The Criollo Argentino’s performance at trot requires the synchronization of joint extension and flexion whose minimal and maximum variations were registered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edgardo Verna, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias ( fallecido)

Docente fallecido. Cátedra Tecnica y Patología Quirúrgica de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias.UNLPam

Santiago Andres Audisio, National University of La Pampa. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences

Profesor Adjunto Cátedra Técnica y Patología Quirúrgica. Especialista en Ciencias Clínicas (FAV-UNRC). Doctor en Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Agropecuaria (FAV-UNRC). Área de conocimiento de las afecciones de osteoarticulares y cirugía ortopédica y traumatológica veterinaria

Pablo Guillermo Vaquero, Fa

Jefe de Trabajos Prácticos Cátedra Técnica y Patología Quirúrgica. Especialista en Educación en Cs Veterinarias (FCV-UNLPam), doctorando en Ciencias Veterinarias (FCV-UNLP). Área de conocimiento de las afecciones osteoarticulares y cirugía ortopédica y traumatológica veterinaria

References

Buchner HH, Savelberg HH Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced foreor hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J.1996 ; 28:71-76.

Buchner, HH, Savelberg HH, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Limb movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet. J. 1996b ; 28, 63-70

Galisteo AM, Vivo J, Cano MR, Morales JL, Miró F, Agüera E. Differences between breeds Dutch Warmblood vs Andalusian Purebreed in forelimb kinematics. J Equine Sc. 1998; 8:43–47.

Clayton HM, Schamhardt HC, Willemen MA, Lanovaz JL, Colborne GR. Kinematics and ground reaction forces in horses with superficial digital flexor tendinitis. Am J Vet Res. 2000; 61:191-196.

Kramer J, Keegan KG, Wilson DA, Smith BK, Wilson DJ. Kinematics of the hind limb in trotting horses after induced lameness of the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints and intra-articular administration of anesthetic. Am J Vet Res.2000 ; 61:1031-1036.

Buchner HH, Obermuller S, Scheidl M. Body centre of mass movement in the lame horse. Equine Vet J Suppl. 2001; 33:122-127.

Valera M, Galisteo AM, Molina A, Miro F, Gómez MD, Cano MR, Agüera E. Genetic parameters of biokinematic variables of the trot in Spanish Purebred horses under experimental treadmill conditions. 2008; Vet J. 178:219-26.

Buchner HH, Savelberg HCM. Inertial properties of Dutch Warmblood horses. J Biomech. 1997 ; 30:653-658.

Clayton HM, Sha, D, Stick JA, Mullineaux DR. Three-dimensional carpal kinematics of trotting horses. Equine Vet J.2004 ; 36:671-676

Robert C, Valette JP, Pourcelot P, Audigié F, Denoix JM. Effects of trotting speed on muscle activity and kinematics in saddlehorses. Eq Vet J Suppl. 2005 ; 34:295-301

Galloux P, Barrey E. Components of the total kinetic moment in jumping horses. Eq Vet J Suppl.1997 ; 23:41–44.

Swanstrom MD, Zarucco L, Hubbard M. Musculoskeletal modeling and dynamic simulation of the thoroughbred equine forelimb during stance phase of the gallop. J Biomech Eng. 2005 ; 127:318-328.

Valette JP, Barrey E, Auvinet B, Galloux P, Wolter R. Comparison of track and treadmill exercise tests in saddle horses: a preliminary report. Annale de Zootechnie. 1992 ; 41:129–135.

Escobar A, Tadich T. Caracterización biocinemática, al paso guiado a la mano, del caballo fino chilote. Arch Med Vet. 2006; 38:53-61.

Martuzzi F, Vaccari Simonini F, Gosi S, Catalano AL. Kinematic characteristics of walk in the Bardigiano Horse breed caratteristiche della cinematica del passo nella razza cavallo Bardigiano. Ann Fac Medic Vet di Parma. 2007; 27:229- 234.

Solé M, Gómez MD, Galisteo AM, Rute S, Valera M. Kinematic Characterization of the Menorca Horse at the Walk and the Trot: Influence of Hind Limb. J Eq Vet Sc. 2013 ; 33:726-732.

Cano MR, Vivo J, Miró F, Morales JL, Galisteo AM. Kinematic characteristics of Andalusian, Arabian and Anglo-Arabian horses: a comparative study. Res Vet Sc. 2001 ; 71:147–153.

Zips S, Peham C, Scheidl M, Licka T, Girtler D. Motion pattern of the toelt of Icelandic horses at different speeds. Equine Vet. J. 2001 ; S33:109–111.

Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat versión .2010 Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

Degueurce C, Pourcelot P, Audigie F, Denoix JM, Geiger D. Variability of the limb joint patterns of sound horses at trot. Equine Vete J Suppl. 1997 ; 23:89-92.

Van Weeren PR, van Bogert AJ, van den Barneveld A. Correction models for skin displacement in equine kinematic gait analysis. J Equ Vet Sc. 1992 ; 12:178-192

Miró Rodríguez F, Martínez Galisteo A, Vivo Rodríguez J, Cano García R. Patrón locomotor del trote del caballo Pura Raza Español y su variabilidad. Rev Elec Clínica Vet. 2008 ; 3:1-17.

Holmström M, Magnusson LE, Philipsson J. Variation in conformation of Swedish warmblood horses and conformational characteristics of elite sport horses. Equine Vet J. 1990 ; 22:186-193.

Holmström M, Philpsson J. Relationships between conformation, performance and health in 4-year-old Swedish Warmblood riding horses. Livestock Prod Sc.1993 ; 33:293-312.

Heglund NC, Cavagna GA, Taylor CR. Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. III. Energy changes of the centre of mass as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J Exp Biol. 1982 ; 79:41–56.

Wilson AM, Watson JC, Lichtwark GA. Biomechanics: a catapult action for rapid limb protraction. Nature. 2003 ; 421:35-36.

Kram, R. Muscular force or work: what determines the metabolic energy cost of running? Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2000 ; 28, 138-143.

Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HHCM, Van Den Bogert AJ, Bruin G Hartman W. How the horse moves: 2. Significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics. Equine Vet J. 1994 ; 27:39-45.

Molina A, Valera M, Galisteo AM, Vivo J, Gómez MD, Rodero A, Agüerac E. Genetic parameters of biokinematic variables at walk in the Spanish Purebred (Andalusian) horse using experimental treadmill records. Livestock Sc. 2008; 116(1–3):137-145.

Back W, Schamhardt HC, Barneveld A. Are kinematics of the walk related to the locomotion of a warmblood horse at the trot? Vet Quarterly. 1996 ; 18:79-84.

Bennett D. 1992. Principles of conformation analysis. Volume I. Fleet street Publishing Co. Gaithesburg. USA.

imagen ilustrativa

Published

2022-01-01

How to Cite

Verna, E., Audisio, S. A., Vaquero, P. G., Rossetto, L., Arriagada, V., & Milanta, G. (2022). Kinematic aspects of the criollo argentino horse at trot. Ciencia Veterinaria, 24(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.19137//cienvet202224105

Issue

Section

Artículos de Investigación