University Teacher training: from rationalisation to positing the problem

  • Cristina Nosei Universidad Nacional de La Pampa
  • Gabriela Caminos

Keywords:

teacher-training, research, understanding, exclusion

Abstract

Acknowledging that school is not what it used to be and it is not for the people it used to be, the discussion at universi­ty level is centred on a false dichotomy: knowledge and experience. This dichot­omy is in most cases based on beliefs and not on knowledge resulting from situat­ed research. It is our aim to make a suggestion to the debate emanating from INFOD’s propos­al as our one decade knowledge fully rep­resents a famous assertion attributed by students to honour L. Stenhouse: only by understanding it, would teachers be able to change school. And understanding does not come from applied knowledge; nor does it come from experience. It originates in praxis. As teacher-trainers, we are socially re­sponsible for the professionals we train. Their commitment should be to battle exclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cristina Nosei, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa

Profesora en Historia. Magíster en Evaluación. UNLPam. Especialista en Análisis Institucio­nal y Animación Socio Cultural de la Universidad Nacional de Salta. Profesora Adjunta de las Cátedras de Didáctica y Práctica Educativa, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, UNLPam.

Gabriela Caminos

Profesora en Ciencias de la Edu­cación. Especialista en Evaluación. UNLPam. Integra las cátedras de Di­dáctica y Práctica Educativa, Facul­tad de Ciencias Humanas, UNLPam.

Published

2012-07-20

How to Cite

Nosei, C., & Caminos, G. (2012). University Teacher training: from rationalisation to positing the problem. Praxis Educativa, 13(13), 80–88. Retrieved from https://cerac.unlpam.edu.ar/ojs/index.php/praxis/article/view/399